Editor & Reviewer Guidelines
Principles and responsibilities governing the editorial evaluation, peer-review process and ethical publication of scholarly research.
Maintaining academic quality, integrity and fairness
The journal's editors are responsible for upholding the quality, integrity and reputation of the publication. They supervise the peer-review process, ensure adherence to ethical standards and make independent decisions regarding manuscript submissions.
Editors also play an important role in promoting the journal, strengthening its academic reach and ensuring that editorial activities are conducted in accordance with established scholarly and publication standards.
Responsibilities of Editors
Editors must ensure transparent evaluation, ethical publication practices and consistently high academic standards.
-
01
Manuscript Evaluation
Editors evaluate manuscripts on the basis of originality, academic significance, research methodology and relevance to the scope of the journal.
-
02
Peer Review Management
Editors manage the peer-review process and ensure that it is conducted promptly, fairly and without bias. They select qualified reviewers and supervise the process to maintain the quality and integrity of academic work.
-
03
Publication Ethics
Editors uphold the highest ethical standards and appropriately address conflicts of interest, plagiarism, duplicate publication, research misconduct and other ethical concerns.
-
04
Clear Communication
Editors maintain timely, professional and transparent communication with authors and reviewers throughout the submission, review and publication process.
-
05
Journal Development
Editors contribute to the academic development of the journal by proposing special issues, identifying relevant themes and formulating or revising editorial policies.
-
06
Editorial Decisions
Based on reviewers’ recommendations and their own academic assessment, editors make fair and independent decisions regarding the acceptance, revision or rejection of manuscripts.
-
07
Quality Assurance
Editors strive to maintain and enhance the scholarly standards of the journal through a rigorous peer-review process and careful evaluation of all published content.
-
08
Confidentiality
Editors safeguard the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts, reviewer identities, editorial correspondence and all information obtained during the review process.
-
09
Academic Relevance
Editors remain informed about current developments in their respective fields to ensure that the journal continues to publish relevant, credible and up-to-date research.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers should provide timely, impartial and constructive assessments that improve the quality of submitted research.
-
01
Maintain Confidentiality
Reviewers must treat the manuscript, associated data and the entire review process as confidential. Manuscript content must not be shared or used for personal advantage.
-
02
Ensure Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted objectively and should be based solely on the academic quality, originality, methodology and relevance of the submitted work.
-
03
Avoid Bias
Reviewers should provide an impartial assessment and avoid personal opinions, prejudice or bias concerning the authors, institutions or subject matter of the research.
-
04
Submit Reviews on Time
Review reports should be submitted within the prescribed deadline. Any anticipated delay or inability to complete the review must be communicated to the editor immediately.
-
05
Use Professional Language
Comments should be communicated professionally and respectfully. Personal criticism, offensive remarks and inappropriate language must be avoided.
-
06
Provide Constructive Feedback
Reviewers should help improve the manuscript by providing clear, detailed and constructive criticism, observations and recommendations.
-
07
Data and Results
Reviewers assess the presentation, consistency and scholarly interpretation of data and results. However, they are not ultimately responsible for the accuracy or authenticity of the data provided by the authors.
Editors and reviewers must disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest that could influence the evaluation of a manuscript. Where such a conflict exists, the concerned editor or reviewer should withdraw from the review process.